Feature
During a recent Ash Center event, experts discussed how the people of Myanmar have responded to recent events and what potential remains for a democratic future in the country.
The February 1st coup launched by Myanmar’s military effectively put an end to the country’s tentative transition to democracy as civilian political leaders were imprisoned and the results of the 2020 elections annulled. During an event sponsored by the Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation and moderated by HKS Professor of Public Policy Tarek Masoud, Pwint Htun, Non-Residential Myanmar Program Fellow at the Ash Center, and Derek Mitchell, president of the National Democratic Institute and former U.S. ambassador to Myanmar, discussed how the people of Myanmar have responded to recent events, and whether there still exists a path to democracy in the country. The following excerpts were taken from the discussion.
“People’s fear of returning to the dark days is a much bigger fear than being killed by the military at the moment. I know the mothers in Myanmar are saying that we know what it’s like to live under the fear of military and police. That era of fear, that era of oppression has to end now. And these women and young people of Myanmar are saying enough.”
“We need an end to the culture of impunity for the military, this institution that has committed gross violations of people’s human rights and mass atrocities over the decades. And we need to shift power from the men with guns, to women with smartphones.”
“Aung Sun Suu Kyi has written a lot about Nehru and Gandhi. And she wrote that in her book, ‘Freedom From Fear,’ that Gandhi’s greatest legacy is in instilling courage in the people of Indiana. And I think Aung Sun Suu Kyi’s one legacy is that she has instilled courage in the people of Myanmar, and I think that is going to be one important legacy for the country moving forward — that we have fearless multi-generations that these people will never take democracy for granted ever again in the future.”
“This coup that destabilized the country and impacted the state of minds of millions of people all over the country, is all to enhance the egotistical commander in chief. So my earnest hope is that there are people within the military who will put the country before the institution of the military.”
“The people are saying enough is enough. We’ve wanted this change. We want the military out. This hybrid system doesn’t work.”
“The people of Myanmar, they want their dignity and freedom… They’re very proud, they’re very stubborn. They will not give up. But the challenge is how do you get the stubborn military to recognize that they’re in the way and figure out a way that they can step back from this and find a new way.”
“[China] wants to have a privileged position in Myanmar. They view the country as their sphere of influence. So they want to have privileged access to resources, privilege access to the Indian Ocean, and they also want…the West out.”
“The Chinese don’t care about Myanmar at all. The people know it, and the military also knows it very well.”
“The events of the last few days suggest that the people of Myanmar are doing their best to defy the grim predictions of the dismal social scientists. Far from acquiescing in the elimination of their country’s small margin of democracy, they have taken to the streets to restore it. And while the military shows no sign of acceding to their demands, it’s clear that we cannot yet talk about the failure of Myanmar’s democracy.”
Video
Harvard community members joined the Ash Center for a Democracy in Hard Places Initiative event featuring Larry Diamond, Mosbacher Senior Fellow of Global Democracy at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University.
Book
In Defending Democracy in an Age of Sharp Power, editors William J. Dobson, Tarek Masoud, and Christopher Walker bring together leading analysts to explain how the world’s authoritarians are attempting to erode the pillars of democratic societies—and what we can do about it.
Feature
Shady ElGhazaly Harb MC/MPA 2023, a prominent youth activist during the 2011 uprising, finds new ways to understand the continuing struggle for democracy in Egypt during his time at Harvard Kennedy School.
Feature
Election integrity is under the microscope as we near the 2024 Presidential Election, and many Americans are apprehensive about election security, the timeframe of learning the results, and how peaceful the transfer of power will be.
Feature
In a climate of growing distrust surrounding elections, election administrators play a pivotal role in safeguarding the integrity of the electoral process.
Occasional Paper
Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation Fellow Alex Pascal and Vanderbilt Law Professor Ganesh Sitaraman make the case that public options for AI and public utility-style regulation of AI will enhance national security by ensuring innovation and competition, preventing abuses of power and conflicts of interest, and advancing public interest and national security goals.
