Feature
Building effective channels for the interaction between AI developers and activist communities is critical for innovating social mobilization and strengthening civil society.
Building active channels for the interaction between AI developers and activist communities yields two key benefits.
First, facilitating exposure to the developer community will enable activists to better understand the technology’s nature and its potential to strengthen civil society. By doing so, they can better harness AI’s full capabilities to support democratic movements. Without a general understanding of the technological landscape, activists may find their capacity to leverage AI significantly constrained. In many cases, promising algorithmic prototypes that could significantly benefit civil groups remain underutilized simply because neither developers nor activists are aware of each other’s needs, despite their genuine interest in each other’s work. Even a quick exchange of information could be highly beneficial in bridging this gap, helping both sides unlock new opportunities for collaboration.
Second, the “AI-for-Social-Movement” agenda should also focus on mobilizing more technical minds to support pro-democracy efforts. Activists working on democracy movements often face concrete challenges that require tailored tools to address effectively. Gaining support from like-minded computer scientists and engineers for tool development is crucial and can provide significant assistance. Initiatives like “Computer Scientists Without Borders” or “Coders Without Borders” can act as crucial bridges between activist and developer communities, fostering greater momentum for civil society empowerment.
From the perspective of activists, mobilizing more technological resources to support pro-democracy efforts involves not only the integration of advanced technologies into advocacy work but also actively engaging with the AI developer community. This requires understanding and adapting to the cultures within developer groups, which may not have been previously familiar with political activists. Over the past thirty years, three principles have emerged as widely shared values within the developer community to which activist groups should pay attention.
The first principle is the reliance on collective wisdom, a concept vividly exemplified by the birth of Linux operating system. An open invitation for collective contributions from the developer community could not only unlock the full potential of technologies for advancing democratic causes but also help expand outreach and raise public awareness of the issue. Major technology companies have similarly collaborative practices to tackle democratic and ethical concerns, as illustrated by OpenAI’s 2023 “Democracy Inputs to AI” initiative. Launching initiatives or coding competitions for premium technique solutions on open programming platforms, like Kaggle, would be a resource-efficient way for pro-democracy groups seeking greater technological advantages.
The second principle is the open-source culture, which has long fostered knowledge sharing and collective development within the computer science community. For activists and democracy defenders, these same open-source principles offer powerful advantages: technology that is transparent, adaptable, and collaboratively enhanced – crucial traits when confronting evolving digital threats and oppressive regimes. A prime example is Amnesty International’s Mobile Verification Toolkit, an open-source tool designed to help activists detect spyware threats. By making the source code publicly available, the initiative benefits a broader activist community by enabling easier local deployment and empowering peer developers to build more advanced security solutions based on it.
The third principle arises from the long-lasting anonymous culture in the hacktivist community. Support from anonymous tech-savvy individuals has played important roles in the past democratization movements, like the Arab Spring in Tunisia and Syria. Anonymity not only protects developers from government revenge but also shields the flow of information from digital censorship and surveillance. A good example is the European-based, well-known non-profit hacker group Chaos Computer Club, which has spent the past forty years providing anonymizing services around the world. Nevertheless, this culture of anonymity stands in stark contrast to the emphasis on interpersonal connections and trust in social movements. Embracing cultural differences means activists need to be prepared to interact with nameless developers in the first place and eventually deploy a technique solution from an anonymous submission. This calls for capacity-building within pro-democracy groups so they can effectively share their values, communicate their demands, and strategically engage with the technical community.
In general, a collective initiative designed to connect AI developer groups with the pro-democracy activist community should prioritize effective information exchange and shared values. This effort can begin with simple steps, such as creating a inclusive online platform that facilitates communication between computer scientists and activists. For activists, adopting AI to strengthen civil society also requires understanding the culture of AI developers, recognizing differences, and designing engagement strategies that fully harness the potential of this emerging technology.
********************************************
The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and do not necessarily represent the positions of the Ash Center or its affiliates.
Commentary
Drawing from her experience deploying an AI-powered chatbot to share accurate voting information during Venezuela’s recent election, Isabella Picón explains how AI technologies can enhance electoral participation and support pro-democracy movements.
Commentary
Freddy Guevara offers a fundamental playbook for social activists on how to augment advocacy efforts with artificial intelligence technologies
Feature
Erica Chenoweth shares a brief addendum to the Nonviolent Action Lab’s workshop held in December 2024 on how AI can influence social mobilization, for better or worse.
Commentary
At a recent Ash Center panel, experts and AI developers discuss how AI’s influence on politics has evolved over the years. They examine the new tools available to politicians, the role of humans in AI’s relationship with governance, and the values guiding the design of these technologies.
Commentary
Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation Fellow Dr. Shlomit Wagman lays out a framework to address the threats artificial intelligence poses to global security and democratic institutions.
Additional Resource
In a recent piece for Tech Policy Press, Allen Lab Senior Fellow Alex Pascal and Nathan Sanders outline how US states are well-positioned to lead the development of Public AI. State governments can act as “laboratories of twenty-first century democracy” to experiment with AI applications that directly benefit citizens.
