Policy Brief  

AGI and Democracy

We face a fundamental question: is the very pursuit of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) the kind of aim democracies should allow?

Photo Credit: Gertrūda Valasevičiūtė, Unsplash

If we are a long way short of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), why worry about it now?

Seth Lazar and Alex Pascal argue that the people building the most advanced AI systems are explicitly and aggressively working to bring AGI about, and they think they’ll get there in two to five years. Even some of the most publicly skeptical AI researchers don’t rule out AGI within this decade. If we, the affected public, do not actively shape this agenda now, we may miss the chance to do so at all. We face a fundamental question: is the very pursuit of AGI the kind of aim democracies should allow?

Related Resources

How A.I. Can Be Good For Democracy

Additional Resource

How A.I. Can Be Good For Democracy

In a recent guest essay for The New York Times, Allen Lab Democracy Stack Fellow Beth Noveck argues for putting A.I. behind every public servant.

More on this Issue

How A.I. Can Be Good For Democracy

Additional Resource

How A.I. Can Be Good For Democracy

In a recent guest essay for The New York Times, Allen Lab Democracy Stack Fellow Beth Noveck argues for putting A.I. behind every public servant.

Massachusetts Municipal Leader Guide: Open Meeting Law in the Digital Age

Additional Resource

Massachusetts Municipal Leader Guide: Open Meeting Law in the Digital Age

As public officials increasingly turn to digital tools, this guide helps Massachusetts municipal leaders navigate Open Meeting Law and their everyday digital practice while safeguarding transparency.