Media Release
In a recently published discussion paper from the Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation at Harvard Kennedy School, Stephen Goldsmith and Ryan Streeter propose a new ideological framework for the conservative movement in the United States centered around aspiration, opportunity, and personal responsibility to help drive upward mobility.
Cambridge, MA – In a recently published discussion paper from the Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation at Harvard Kennedy School, Stephen Goldsmith and Ryan Streeter propose a new ideological framework for the conservative movement in the United States centered around aspiration, opportunity, and personal responsibility to help drive upward mobility.
Goldsmith, the Derek Bok Professor of the Practice of Urban Policy at HKS, was the George W. Bush campaign’s chief domestic policy advisor in 2000. Streeter, the executive director of research and publications for the Civitas Institute at the University of Texas at Austin, previously served as a special assistant for domestic policy to President George W. Bush at the White House.
Goldsmith and Streeter’s An Aspirational Path for American Conservatism lays the groundwork for what the pair term “aspirational conservatism,” rejecting what they argue are the false choices of culture-war populism and nationalism. Yet, the paper also warns against a return to what Goldsmith and Streeter dismiss as “conservatism-light,” with its anti-government as opposed to reform minded focus.
Rather, the paper call for elevating what they identify as a long running strain of conservative thought present in American politics, which has consistently argued for the central role of aspiration, opportunity, and personal responsibility in upward mobility. “Its followers display a strong preference for locally devolved problem solving, a safety net that incentivizes skill development and employment, and a commitment to removing barriers that disadvantage those with little financial and social capital,” Goldsmith and Streeter write.
The authors make the case that an overemphasis on blunt tax cuts and unfocused regulatory changes has done little to improve the individual happiness of most Americans. They lay out a vision of aspirational conservativism that believes upward mobility stems not only from a dynamic economy but also from educational environments that drive success, strong families and neighborhoods, workplaces that reward conscientiousness and achievement, and values-shaping institutions such as congregations and private charities.
“We argue here for conservative governance that is respectful of its citizens, supportive of America’s underlying values, mindful that significant challenges remain, and aware that good politics and good policy require an effective government that helps individuals achieve their aspirations.”
The Roy and Lila Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation, a research center at Harvard Kennedy School is Harvard’s hub for the study, discussion, and analysis of democracy. The Ash Center’s mission is to develop ideas and foster practices for equal and inclusive, multi-racial and multi-ethnic democracy and self-government.
Podcast
Amanda Carpenter of Protect Democracy joins hosts Archon Fung and Stephen Richer to examine how today’s alarmingly-high levels of political corruption undermine democratic institutions and public trust, distort policymaking, and make citizens increasingly cynical about the democratic process.
Article
A new article in the American Journal of Political Science, co-authored by Yanilda María González, Ford Foundation Associate Professor of Public Policy and Ash Center affiliate, examines public attitudes toward police violence in Brazil. The authors find that while police discourse can increase public endorsement of violence, counternarratives from marginalized victims can be effective in reducing citizen support for repressive policing.
Article
In a recent American Journal of Public Health essay, Ash Center Director Archon Fung, Democracy Visiting Fellow Aditya S. Pawar, former Non-resident Fellow Jon Alexander, and their co-authors examine how public deliberation and civic engagement can produce more efficient and reliable public health policy.
Feature
Books, reports, and articles exploring the front lines of American politics and democracy, as featured on the Terms of Engagement podcast.
Feature
Tova Wang, director of research projects in democratic practice at the Ash Center, shares her top picks for summer reads focused on making democracy more resilient, responsive, and inclusive.
Commentary
Allen Lab Fellow Tyler Fisher examines the untapped potential of city charters as a vehicle for deliberative democracy, arguing that advocates should work to embed tools like citizen assemblies, participatory budgeting, and town meetings directly into the governing architecture of cities, institutionalizing deliberative democracy one municipality at a time.