Feature  

Ash Center Launches New Program on Democracy and the Informed Public

The Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation at Harvard Kennedy School, has announced the launch of a new Program on Democracy and the Informed Public, a major initiative designed to strengthen democratic governance by improving how people access, understand, and use essential information.

A photo of a sunrise.

The Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation at Harvard Kennedy School, has announced the launch of a new Program on Democracy and the Informed Public, a major initiative designed to strengthen democratic governance by improving how people access, understand, and use essential information.

At a time of rapid technological change, growing information inequality, and declining trust in institutions, the Program will examine how Americans receive information about everyday risks, rights, public services, and civic responsibilities — and how better communication can help individuals, families, and communities make informed decisions.

An informed public is the cornerstone of democracy. Yet too often, people lack the information they need to protect their health and safety, exercise their rights, or participate fully in civic life. This Program led by co-directors Archon Fung and David Weil, and Program Director Jessica Creighton, will focus on closing those gaps.

Addressing a Growing Challenge

While governments, businesses, and institutions collect more data than ever before, critical information about health, safety, consumer protection, and civic participation frequently fails to reach the people who need it most. Research shows that workers, consumers, and community members often face hidden risks — from unsafe workplaces and contaminated drinking water to complex benefit systems and opaque digital platforms.

A Collaborative, Research-Driven Approach

Housed at the Ash Center, the Program builds on the Center’s long-standing work in democratic innovation and transparency. It will bring together scholars, journalists, policymakers, technologists, and community organizations to study real-world cases, test new approaches to public communication, and translate research into actionable policy insights.  Initial research focuses on workplace rights, public health communications, and election information, with plans to expand further.

Looking Ahead

The initiative will begin as a three-year program, with plans to grow into a long-term effort supporting research, education, and public engagement over the next decade.

Related Resources

Information Inequality Can Be a Matter of Life or Death
two side-by-side screenshots of emergency alerts

Commentary

Information Inequality Can Be a Matter of Life or Death

In this paper, Mary W. Graham, co-director of the Center’s Transparency Policy Project, explores the unintended information inequities that weaken the nation’s vital health and safety alerts. By examining three policies — wildfire alerts, drinking water reports, and auto safety recalls — she suggests common sources of inequality problems and steps policy makers are taking to remedy them.

Exploring Democratic Deliberation in Public Health: Bridging Division and Enhancing Community Engagement
A graphic of someone placing a ballot into a box with a red plus sign.

Article

Exploring Democratic Deliberation in Public Health: Bridging Division and Enhancing Community Engagement

Trust between citizens and the institutions that govern them is essential for effective policy, especially in public health. However, against a backdrop of escalating political polarization and rising levels of misinformation, there has been a stark decline in public confidence in government and health institutions.

Does Transparency Improve Governance?
A magnifying glass against a newspaper.

Article

Does Transparency Improve Governance?

In this study, Archon Fung and Stephen Kosack assess the current state of transparency initiatives across the globe. Honing in on interventions with a focus on “transparency for accountability”—which show mixed results—they develop a framework of five “worlds” that helps account for the variation in outcomes.

More on this Issue

Information Inequality Can Be a Matter of Life or Death
two side-by-side screenshots of emergency alerts

Commentary

Information Inequality Can Be a Matter of Life or Death

In this paper, Mary W. Graham, co-director of the Center’s Transparency Policy Project, explores the unintended information inequities that weaken the nation’s vital health and safety alerts. By examining three policies — wildfire alerts, drinking water reports, and auto safety recalls — she suggests common sources of inequality problems and steps policy makers are taking to remedy them.

Exploring Democratic Deliberation in Public Health: Bridging Division and Enhancing Community Engagement
A graphic of someone placing a ballot into a box with a red plus sign.

Article

Exploring Democratic Deliberation in Public Health: Bridging Division and Enhancing Community Engagement

Trust between citizens and the institutions that govern them is essential for effective policy, especially in public health. However, against a backdrop of escalating political polarization and rising levels of misinformation, there has been a stark decline in public confidence in government and health institutions.

Does Transparency Improve Governance?
A magnifying glass against a newspaper.

Article

Does Transparency Improve Governance?

In this study, Archon Fung and Stephen Kosack assess the current state of transparency initiatives across the globe. Honing in on interventions with a focus on “transparency for accountability”—which show mixed results—they develop a framework of five “worlds” that helps account for the variation in outcomes.