Article  

Does Transparency Improve Governance?

In this study, Archon Fung and Stephen Kosack assess the current state of transparency initiatives across the globe. Honing in on interventions with a focus on “transparency for accountability”—which show mixed results—they develop a framework of five “worlds” that helps account for the variation in outcomes.

A magnifying glass against a newspaper.

With the existing research literature yielding mixed results on the effectiveness of transparency interventions, Archon Fung, Director of Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation and
Winthrop Laflin McCormack Professor of Citizenship and Self-Government and Stephen Kosack of the University of Washington offer a review of the state of transparency initiatives across the globe.

Fung and Kosack center their focus on the area of “transparency for accountability,” which aims to offers a “tool for dealing with increasingly practical and specific concerns of government performance.” In an analysis of 16 studies, the authors find that the success of transparency programs is greatly influenced by social context, with interventions more likely to achieve their goals when “information is clearly understandable and salient to citizens” and recommend “a clear course of action.”

Related Resources

Building Capacity to Use Social Media: How Election Officials Can Leverage Content Creation to Provide Accurate Voter Information
A content creator with a microphone.

Paper

Building Capacity to Use Social Media: How Election Officials Can Leverage Content Creation to Provide Accurate Voter Information

This paper examines the growing role of content creators as information sources in modern society, proposing frameworks for effective collaboration between creators and election officials and offering recommendations for election officials to develop their own social media content.

Paradise Revisited
Firefighters putting out a forest fire with hoses.

Policy Brief

Paradise Revisited

Technology has enriched the lives of Americans with novel communication choices. It has also made it more difficult to reach everyone in emergencies. In a new policy brief, Mary W. Graham, senior fellow at the Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation, explores this new paradox of the digital transition.

New Forms of Targeted Transparency
An outstretched hand holding up graphics of paper and a gavel.

Article

New Forms of Targeted Transparency

A summary of the March 30, 2026 event that welcomed Gerrit von Zedlitz to present on new and less-studied forms of targeted transparency—how they work, when they emerge, and whether they actually make a difference.

More on this Issue

New Forms of Targeted Transparency
An outstretched hand holding up graphics of paper and a gavel.

Article

New Forms of Targeted Transparency

A summary of the March 30, 2026 event that welcomed Gerrit von Zedlitz to present on new and less-studied forms of targeted transparency—how they work, when they emerge, and whether they actually make a difference.

Information Inequality Can Be a Matter of Life or Death
two side-by-side screenshots of emergency alerts

Commentary

Information Inequality Can Be a Matter of Life or Death

In this paper, Mary W. Graham, Ash Center Senior Fellow and longtime co-director of the Center’s former Transparency Policy Project, explores the unintended information inequities that weaken the nation’s vital health and safety alerts. By examining three policies — wildfire alerts, drinking water reports, and auto safety recalls — she suggests common sources of inequality problems and steps policy makers are taking to remedy them.