Ash Center logo

Article  

Does Transparency Improve Governance?

In this study, Archon Fung and Stephen Kosack assess the current state of transparency initiatives across the globe. Honing in on interventions with a focus on “transparency for accountability”—which show mixed results—they develop a framework of five “worlds” that helps account for the variation in outcomes.

By:

Programs

Transparency for Development (T4D)

Issues

Information and Transparency

Download the PDF

A magnifying glass against a newspaper.

With the existing research literature yielding mixed results on the effectiveness of transparency interventions, Archon Fung, Director of Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation and
Winthrop Laflin McCormack Professor of Citizenship and Self-Government and Stephen Kosack of the University of Washington offer a review of the state of transparency initiatives across the globe.

Fung and Kosack center their focus on the area of “transparency for accountability,” which aims to offers a “tool for dealing with increasingly practical and specific concerns of government performance.” In an analysis of 16 studies, the authors find that the success of transparency programs is greatly influenced by social context, with interventions more likely to achieve their goals when “information is clearly understandable and salient to citizens” and recommend “a clear course of action.”

Related Resources

How Americans Navigate Voting Information Ahead of the 2026 Midterm Elections
Captiol building with trend graphic

Additional Resource

How Americans Navigate Voting Information Ahead of the 2026 Midterm Elections

The Shorenstein Center’s 2026 Voting Information Trends project—developed in collaboration with the National Internet Observatory at Northeastern University, the Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation’s Program on Democracy and the Informed Public, and The Civic Health and Institutions Project—provides new insights into the voter information landscape in the United States ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Among the resources, an interactive dashboard maps where Americans are finding voting information and learning about key aspects of the voting process—from sourcing polling locations to voter registration. Also included are a series of trends reports gauging perceptions of voting in the lead up to the 2026 midterm elections.

Content Creators, Election Administration, and Voting: Can Social Media Be Used to Improve the Voter Information Environment?
Woman holding phone with a cup of coffee

Video

Content Creators, Election Administration, and Voting: Can Social Media Be Used to Improve the Voter Information Environment?

In this webinar moderated by Tova Wang, director of democratic research projects at the Ash Center, panelists Julia Angwin, Amanda Yarnell, Tommy Gong, and Brianna Wiggity Weck explore how election officials can leverage social media’s reach to improve public awareness around voter registration, voting, and election integrity. The discussion builds on the Ash Center paper, “Building Capacity to Use Social Media: How Election Officials Can Leverage Content Creation to Provide Accurate Voter Information,” which outlines frameworks for collaboration between election officials and digital content creators.

More on this Issue

How Americans Navigate Voting Information Ahead of the 2026 Midterm Elections
Captiol building with trend graphic

Additional Resource

How Americans Navigate Voting Information Ahead of the 2026 Midterm Elections

The Shorenstein Center’s 2026 Voting Information Trends project—developed in collaboration with the National Internet Observatory at Northeastern University, the Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation’s Program on Democracy and the Informed Public, and The Civic Health and Institutions Project—provides new insights into the voter information landscape in the United States ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Among the resources, an interactive dashboard maps where Americans are finding voting information and learning about key aspects of the voting process—from sourcing polling locations to voter registration. Also included are a series of trends reports gauging perceptions of voting in the lead up to the 2026 midterm elections.

Raising Wages by Changing Norms: Work Policy for the Long Game
Protest for raising the minimum wage

Paper

Raising Wages by Changing Norms: Work Policy for the Long Game

When Amazon announced a company-wide $15 minimum wage in 2018, the obvious assumption was that every competitor fighting for the same workers would have to match it or lose their workforce. They didn’t. Despite dramatic wage jumps at the companies that voluntarily raised their floors — and real cuts to turnover and hiring costs that made the move pay for itself — researchers find zero evidence of wage spillovers to the “poacher” and “feeder” companies competing in the very same local labor markets. The explanation turns out to say less about generosity than about just how much leverage employers hold over workers who have nowhere else to go.