Article  

Does Transparency Improve Governance?

In this study, Archon Fung and Stephen Kosack assess the current state of transparency initiatives across the globe. Honing in on interventions with a focus on “transparency for accountability”—which show mixed results—they develop a framework of five “worlds” that helps account for the variation in outcomes.

A magnifying glass against a newspaper.

With the existing research literature yielding mixed results on the effectiveness of transparency interventions, Archon Fung, Director of Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation and
Winthrop Laflin McCormack Professor of Citizenship and Self-Government and Stephen Kosack of the University of Washington offer a review of the state of transparency initiatives across the globe.

Fung and Kosack center their focus on the area of “transparency for accountability,” which aims to offers a “tool for dealing with increasingly practical and specific concerns of government performance.” In an analysis of 16 studies, the authors find that the success of transparency programs is greatly influenced by social context, with interventions more likely to achieve their goals when “information is clearly understandable and salient to citizens” and recommend “a clear course of action.”

Related Resources

Ash Center Launches New Program on Democracy and the Informed Public
A photo of a sunrise.

Feature

Ash Center Launches New Program on Democracy and the Informed Public

The Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation at Harvard Kennedy School, has announced the launch of a new Program on Democracy and the Informed Public, a major initiative designed to strengthen democratic governance by improving how people access, understand, and use essential information.

Information Inequality Can Be a Matter of Life or Death
two side-by-side screenshots of emergency alerts

Commentary

Information Inequality Can Be a Matter of Life or Death

In this paper, Mary W. Graham, co-director of the Center’s Transparency Policy Project, explores the unintended information inequities that weaken the nation’s vital health and safety alerts. By examining three policies — wildfire alerts, drinking water reports, and auto safety recalls — she suggests common sources of inequality problems and steps policy makers are taking to remedy them.

Exploring Democratic Deliberation in Public Health: Bridging Division and Enhancing Community Engagement
A graphic of someone placing a ballot into a box with a red plus sign.

Article

Exploring Democratic Deliberation in Public Health: Bridging Division and Enhancing Community Engagement

Trust between citizens and the institutions that govern them is essential for effective policy, especially in public health. However, against a backdrop of escalating political polarization and rising levels of misinformation, there has been a stark decline in public confidence in government and health institutions.