Feature  

Ash Center Launches New Program on Democracy and the Informed Public

The Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation at Harvard Kennedy School, has announced the launch of a new Program on Democracy and the Informed Public, a major initiative designed to strengthen democratic governance by improving how people access, understand, and use essential information.

A photo of a sunrise.

The Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation at Harvard Kennedy School, has announced the launch of a new Program on Democracy and the Informed Public, a major initiative designed to strengthen democratic governance by improving how people access, understand, and use essential information.

At a time of rapid technological change, growing information inequality, and declining trust in institutions, the Program will examine how Americans receive information about everyday risks, rights, public services, and civic responsibilities — and how better communication can help individuals, families, and communities make informed decisions.

An informed public is the cornerstone of democracy. Yet too often, people lack the information they need to protect their health and safety, exercise their rights, or participate fully in civic life. This Program led by co-directors Archon Fung and David Weil, and Program Director Jessica Creighton, will focus on closing those gaps.

Addressing a Growing Challenge

While governments, businesses, and institutions collect more data than ever before, critical information about health, safety, consumer protection, and civic participation frequently fails to reach the people who need it most. Research shows that workers, consumers, and community members often face hidden risks — from unsafe workplaces and contaminated drinking water to complex benefit systems and opaque digital platforms.

A Collaborative, Research-Driven Approach

Housed at the Ash Center, the Program builds on the Center’s long-standing work in democratic innovation and transparency. It will bring together scholars, journalists, policymakers, technologists, and community organizations to study real-world cases, test new approaches to public communication, and translate research into actionable policy insights.  Initial research focuses on workplace rights, public health communications, and election information, with plans to expand further.

Looking Ahead

The initiative will begin as a three-year program, with plans to grow into a long-term effort supporting research, education, and public engagement over the next decade.

Related Resources

How Americans Navigate Voting Information Ahead of the 2026 Midterm Elections
Captiol building with trend graphic

Additional Resource

How Americans Navigate Voting Information Ahead of the 2026 Midterm Elections

The Shorenstein Center’s 2026 Voting Information Trends project—developed in collaboration with the National Internet Observatory at Northeastern University, the Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation’s Program on Democracy and the Informed Public, and The Civic Health and Institutions Project—provides new insights into the voter information landscape in the United States ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Among the resources, an interactive dashboard maps where Americans are finding voting information and learning about key aspects of the voting process—from sourcing polling locations to voter registration. Also included are a series of trends reports gauging perceptions of voting in the lead up to the 2026 midterm elections.

Content Creators, Election Administration, and Voting: Can Social Media Be Used to Improve the Voter Information Environment?
Woman holding phone with a cup of coffee

Video

Content Creators, Election Administration, and Voting: Can Social Media Be Used to Improve the Voter Information Environment?

In this webinar moderated by Tova Wang, director of democratic research projects at the Ash Center, panelists Julia Angwin, Amanda Yarnell, Tommy Gong, and Brianna Wiggity Weck explore how election officials can leverage social media’s reach to improve public awareness around voter registration, voting, and election integrity. The discussion builds on the Ash Center paper, “Building Capacity to Use Social Media: How Election Officials Can Leverage Content Creation to Provide Accurate Voter Information,” which outlines frameworks for collaboration between election officials and digital content creators.

More on this Issue

How Americans Navigate Voting Information Ahead of the 2026 Midterm Elections
Captiol building with trend graphic

Additional Resource

How Americans Navigate Voting Information Ahead of the 2026 Midterm Elections

The Shorenstein Center’s 2026 Voting Information Trends project—developed in collaboration with the National Internet Observatory at Northeastern University, the Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation’s Program on Democracy and the Informed Public, and The Civic Health and Institutions Project—provides new insights into the voter information landscape in the United States ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Among the resources, an interactive dashboard maps where Americans are finding voting information and learning about key aspects of the voting process—from sourcing polling locations to voter registration. Also included are a series of trends reports gauging perceptions of voting in the lead up to the 2026 midterm elections.

Raising Wages by Changing Norms: Work Policy for the Long Game
Protest for raising the minimum wage

Paper

Raising Wages by Changing Norms: Work Policy for the Long Game

When Amazon announced a company-wide $15 minimum wage in 2018, the obvious assumption was that every competitor fighting for the same workers would have to match it or lose their workforce. They didn’t. Despite dramatic wage jumps at the companies that voluntarily raised their floors — and real cuts to turnover and hiring costs that made the move pay for itself — researchers find zero evidence of wage spillovers to the “poacher” and “feeder” companies competing in the very same local labor markets. The explanation turns out to say less about generosity than about just how much leverage employers hold over workers who have nowhere else to go.