Feature
Reimagining Democracy 2026 Summer Reading List
Tova Wang, director of research projects in democratic practice at the Ash Center, shares her top picks for summer reads focused on making democracy more resilient, responsive, and inclusive.
Feature
Election integrity is under the microscope as we near the 2024 Presidential Election, and many Americans are apprehensive about election security, the timeframe of learning the results, and how peaceful the transfer of power will be.
Election integrity is under the microscope as we near the 2024 Presidential Election, and many Americans are apprehensive about election security, the timeframe of learning the results, and how peaceful the transfer of power will be. No one is bearing the weight of these concerns more so than election administration officials across the country, especially in key swing states.
To learn more about how states are preparing to conduct safe, secure, and transparent elections this November, the Ash Center hosted a webinar this month where participants could learn more straight from the source: election officials from the swing states of Arizona, Michigan, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania.
Throughout the conversation, the panelists asserted that while it may take some time to certify the results — as Karen Brinson Bell, Executive Director of the North Carolina Board of Elections, says “getting results to a county board of elections doesn’t happen instantaneously; this is not Cup-of-Noodle,” — they are committed to protecting the democratic process.
“The bottom line is we’re all going to be working in a transparent, secure, and efficient way, tabulate every valid vote and only valid votes…we’ve been building partnerships on all fronts, and we recognize that the best defense against the potential for violence is to be well prepared and committed to ensuring not just a peaceful transfer of power, but also a peaceful elections process,” says Michigan’s Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson.
“There has been a constant effort of testing the system to try to identify vulnerabilities where bad faith actors may attempt to undermine confidence in the results or prevent certification from taking place. We are also working to protect voters’ rights and ensure that their voices are heard,” explains Al Schmidt, Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
“What we do in elections in North Carolina is we prepare, and we dot the “I’s” and cross the “T’s” and follow consistent, methodical procedures. We’re ready to pivot if a crisis comes…a lot is going on in North Carolina, but the reality is that we don’t stop elections. And at the end of the day, we are committed: Every North Carolinian who wants to cast a ballot is going to be able to,” ensures Karen Brinson Bell, Executive Director of the North Carolina Board of Elections.
“We had an election denier lose in the Governor’s race. We had an election denier lose the Secretary of State race. We had an election denier lose the Attorney General’s race,” states Adrian Fontes, Arizona’s Secretary of State. “We get the basic job done repeatedly, as we’ve seen in all our court challenges, we are successful in making sure that folks know that we are still running great elections in Arizona, and I think across the United States of America.”
“The megaphone of people spreading mis and disinformation is a lot louder and is certainly a lot louder than mine in the Pennsylvania Department of State, but we’ve got to do what we can to always tell the truth in the face of all these lies. Seeking to undermine confidence in the results, seeking to prevent voters from casting their vote and have their vote counted as frustrating as it sometimes is,” describes Schmidt.
“We’re practicing what I like to call radical transparency here in Arizona… observers can sit in this room and watch through the windows all the ballots, moving from the point where they are opened, verified, and tabulated through the process,” comments Fontes.
“The real key is to become a poll worker, go to the meetings, do things to get involved, to understand these processes and all the layers that are in place to make sure that people’s votes count and are counted accurately,” asserts Brinson Bell.
“I think folks are paying attention to us because we have the receipts. We’re the ones with the evidence. We’re the ones with the trusted information to push out there to the public. I think we are breaking through, but it’s going to be a slow drip,” discerns Adrian Fontes.
“Many of my colleagues here have that boots-on-the-ground experience, and I think that’s becoming such an interesting facet of the work that we’re doing and how we’re able to speak to these processes and how we are so confident in our processes and the certification is because so many of us now, it is a profession and a field of study and work,” observes Brinson Bell.
“Since the new constitutional amendment in 2020, we’ve seen back-to-back records for the highest turnout elections in our state’s history. It turns out all the policies that we study — from election day registration to the ability to vote from home or vote by mail, or the ability to vote early in person – translate into more engagement among citizens,” reflects Benson.
“I think sometimes we forget that our judicial system held fast in the face of an avalanche of litigation seeking to prevent our voters’ votes in Philadelphia, cast by eligible voters on or before election day, from being counted or to prevent certification,” discerns Schmidt.
“We’ve also had provisions in our laws for decades where people can be at the polling places on election day to see the opening and see the closing of those polls. So, there are many avenues for people to see those processes taking place,” says Brinson Bell.
The above excerpts, edited for clarity and length, are taken from the remarks of the speakers.
Feature
Tova Wang, director of research projects in democratic practice at the Ash Center, shares her top picks for summer reads focused on making democracy more resilient, responsive, and inclusive.
Podcast
Public interest technologist Bruce Schneier joins Terms of Engagement hosts Archon Fung and Stephen Richer to discuss circumstances under which AI systems could defy doom-and-gloom scenarios and actually enhance democracy and civic engagement.
Podcast
Andrea Hailey, who leads Vote.org, one of the nation’s largest nonpartisan voter engagement platforms, joins hosts Archon Fung and Stephen Richer on Terms of Engagement to discuss trends, turnout, and trepidation as we head into the pivotal 2026 midterm elections.
Feature
Tova Wang, director of research projects in democratic practice at the Ash Center, shares her top picks for summer reads focused on making democracy more resilient, responsive, and inclusive.
Commentary
Allen Lab Fellow Tyler Fisher examines the untapped potential of city charters as a vehicle for deliberative democracy, arguing that advocates should work to embed tools like citizen assemblies, participatory budgeting, and town meetings directly into the governing architecture of cities, institutionalizing deliberative democracy one municipality at a time.
Commentary
Allen Lab member Charlie Covit reflects on the After Neoliberalism conference and examines the intersection of artificial intelligence and the future of work, arguing that AI forces a democratic reckoning with the meaning of labor itself and that an economy which generates abundance while stripping citizens of purpose and dignity undermines the very foundation of democratic life.