Feature  

Reimagining Democracy Summer Reading List

A collection of must-reads curated by Ash Center’s Reimagining Democracy team.

A collection of books recommended by the Reimagining Democracy team.

As summer unfolds, the Reimagining Democracy team invites you to engage with a curated selection of thought-provoking books and research that reflect the values and challenges of democracy in our time.

 

In COVID’s Wake: How Our Politics Failed Us

Stephen Macedo and Frances Lee
Book cover of: "In Covid's Wake, How Our Politics Failed Us"
Macedo and Lee are politics scholars at Princeton University. In this provocative book, they argue that Americans, their leaders, and our political institutions didn’t do very well in handing the COVID-19 pandemic. The most striking parts of the book for me have to do with how many of us in Blue cities and states were really confident that we were “following the science” and that people who disagreed with us were callous or stupid. It turns out that we were flat wrong on many questions and decisions about COVID. Their book reminds me that we all could use a dose of humility and we need to walk the talk of inclusive deliberation and democracy.
-Archon Fung 

Resisting Backsliding: Opposition Strategies Against the Erosion of Democracy

Book cover of "Resisting Backsliding"
Laura Gamboa
The lion’s share of scholarship on “democratic backsliding” and authoritarian government looks at how political systems and societies lose their democratic institutions, norms, and practices. By contrast, Gamboa’s book examines different strategies that opposition politicians and movements pursue to oppose authoritarians. She offers a clear framework for what is more and less likely to work for those who seek to defend democracy when it is in trouble. No doubt scholars and activists will find much to contest in her work, but she sets the table well and very helpfully.
-Archon Fung 

The Rise and Fall of the Neoliberal Order: America and the World in the Free Market Era

Book cover of: "The Rise and Fall of the Neoliberal Order"

Gary Gerstle

In this follow up to his 1990 Rise and Fall of the New Deal Order, Gerstle’s book reminded me that at any particular time, the arguments between the left and the right in American politics occupy a tiny portion of the full spectrum of what is possible and very likely what is desirable. The Neoliberal Order governed America from the mid 1970s until the 2010s. What makes this period an “order” is the agreement – especially between Republicans and Democrats – on what society should look like and policies should be. If a signal moment of the New Deal order was Eisenhower’s (a Republican) endorsement of the policy basics that Roosevelt created, a watershed in the birth of neoliberalism was Bill Clinton’s (a Democrat) acceptance of the main tenants of Reaganism: free markets, deregulation, globalization, reduced social benefits.

Donald Trump has likely brought an end to the Neoliberal Order. Gerstle’s book puts the most important question squarely in front of us: what will the next political “order” look like? Do we want to try to recreate the neoliberal order, or move on to something that is hopefully better?

-Archon Fung 

Undivided: The Quest for Racial Solidarity In An American Church

Book cover of "Undivided"

Hahrie Han
I’ve been heavily influenced by Professor Hahrie Han’s work for years. In her most recent book, Undivided, Hahrie Han provided me with my new mantra: “belonging before belief.” Organizations need to provide people with a sense of belonging first rather than start with a belief system that the individual may or may not currently buy into. Using an evangelical church in Ohio as her case study, Professor Han highlights the importance of creating spaces where people can wrestle with differences while building relationships rooted in trust and shared purpose.
-Tova Wang 

The 2024 Presidential Election: The Broken Bond Between Youth and Democracy

Cover photo of the report

Melina Geser-Stark

Since the 2024 election there has been endless discussion of the apparent rightward shift of GenZ, which had been thought to be more liberal than other age cohorts.  But rather than jumping to the conclusion that this is a triumph of the far Right, Geser-Stark persuasively argues that it is more an expression of deep disaffection from the democratic system and disillusionment with the status quo and every leader who has gotten us to the present state.  She demonstrates this with a variety of polling data, and most interestingly points out that this phenomenon is happening in other countries as well.  The difference is that in these European multi-party systems, GenZ has been voting for the far left as often as the far right, bolstering her argument that it is a rejection of the establishment more than a shift to the Right.  I find this paper even more interesting in the wake of the victory of Mamdani in the recent NYC primary, a Democratic Socialist who was swept to his win by new young voters.

-Tova Wang 

 

 

 

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily represent the positions of the Ash Center or its affiliates.

Related Resources

Contesting repression in divided democracies: Can counternarratives reduce support for police violence?
An image of 4 police officer shields.

Article

Contesting repression in divided democracies: Can counternarratives reduce support for police violence?

A new article in the American Journal of Political Science by Yanilda María González, Ford Foundation Associate Professor of Public Policy and Ash Center affiliate, and co-author, examines public attitudes towards police violence in Brazil. The authors find that while police discourse can increase public endorsement of violence, counternarratives from marginalized victims can be effective in reducing citizen support for repressive policing.

Reframing Efficiency: How Public Deliberation Strengthens Public Health Policy
A blue, green, and orange crowd of abstract figures with hospital ceiling lights in the background.

Article

Reframing Efficiency: How Public Deliberation Strengthens Public Health Policy

In a recent essay for the American Journal of Public Health, Aditya S. Pawar, Democracy Visiting Fellow; Jon Alexander, former Non-resident Democracy Fellow; Archon Fung, Director of the Ash Center; and co-authors examine how public deliberation and representative engagement can shape more efficient and reliable public health policy.

Terms of Engagement – How to Be a Dissident in an Age of Fear
Episode 49 graphic.

Podcast

Terms of Engagement – How to Be a Dissident in an Age of Fear

What does it take to stand up for what you believe in when your personal safety, security and even liberty are at stake? Ami Fields-Meyer, a political strategist and former senior policy advisor in the Biden-Harris White House, joins Terms of Engagement hosts Archon Fung and Stephen Richer to speak about speaking out in tumultuous times.

More on this Issue

Terms of Engagement Summer Reading List
A collage of book and report recommendations from the Terms of Engagement summer reading list.

Feature

Terms of Engagement Summer Reading List

Books, reports, and articles exploring the front lines of American politics and democracy, as featured on the Terms of Engagement podcast.

Reimagining Democracy 2026 Summer Reading List
A collage of book covers, podcasts, and reports from the Reimagining Democracy summer reading list.

Feature

Reimagining Democracy 2026 Summer Reading List

Tova Wang, director of research projects in democratic practice at the Ash Center, shares her top picks for summer reads focused on making democracy more resilient, responsive, and inclusive.

Allen Lab Fellow Spotlight: City Charters Are Deliberative Democracy’s Friends

Commentary

Allen Lab Fellow Spotlight: City Charters Are Deliberative Democracy’s Friends

Allen Lab Fellow Tyler Fisher examines the untapped potential of city charters as a vehicle for deliberative democracy, arguing that advocates should work to embed tools like citizen assemblies, participatory budgeting, and town meetings directly into the governing architecture of cities, institutionalizing deliberative democracy one municipality at a time.