Feature
‘The writing was on the wall’
Five insights on race, class, and gender in the 2024 presidential election from Professors Khalil Gibran Muhammad and Leah Wright Rigueur
Feature
Diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts may have a political target on them, but the scholarly literature is clear that they help universities recruit, retain, and teach a more racially diverse pool of talented students and faculty, says the Kennedy School’s Khalil Gibran Muhammad.
Nearly three years after George Floyd’s death sparked a national reckoning over racial justice and accountability, diversity initiatives are increasingly coming under attack as politicians take aim at programs intended to foster inclusion and equity — particularly those on college campuses. While efforts to scale back diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programming at public universities may make for a potent talking point on the campaign trail, they ignore the impact that these initiatives have had in strengthening student and faculty outcomes in higher education, according to Khalil Gibran Muhammad, Ford Foundation Professor of History, Race, and Public Policy at Harvard Kennedy School.
Muhammad, the faculty director of the Kennedy School’s Institutional Antiracism and Accountability (IARA) Project, has developed a repository of social science research examining diversity, racial equity, and antiracist organizational change in private, public, and non-profit firms and entities. The research, highlighted in the project’s Race, Research, and Policy Portal (RRAPP), “shows that DEI programs are important tools for recruiting and maintaining diverse cohorts of faculty, staff, and students at universities across the country,” says Muhammad.
Citing a study by Texas A&M researchers, Muhammad notes that attempts by universities to incorporate diversity-related goals into formal campus planning, the sort of DEI efforts now under attack in a number of states, have reaped tremendous dividends for colleges and universities. “Further review of this literature has demonstrated that improving accountability, equity, and overall campus climate strengthens a university’s mission of academic success,” he adds.
For Muhammad, diversity training is one important intervention among many others, including focused leadership, data collection, and performance standards. “Businesses are clamoring for a diverse workforce. We need students who have cultural competency and are comfortable learning and working in diverse environments. Our universities need to reflect our increasingly diverse country and teach their students to thrive in environments where not everyone looks the same. Universities are some of the best placed institutions to do that work.”
Researchers have also demonstrated how DEI initiatives can lead to important gains in student retention, particularly among students of color. “The scholarship is pretty clear on this,” says Erica Licht, the research project director at IARA, who leads reviews of academic literature on institutional diversity efforts as part of the project’s research portal. “Universities expend tremendous efforts to retain students. Rolling back funding for diversity officers, training, and curricular support is likely to adversely impact retention rates at universities, which will paradoxically hit those schools in the pocketbook with lost tuition.”
Licht and Muhammad are also quick to note the importance that DEI initiatives have played in reforming the hiring process at colleges and universities. Muhammad points to a study featured in the RRAPP database detailing how DEI efforts have helped faculty and administrators identify problems in the faculty hiring process and ultimately make changes to increase the pool of junior faculty of color. “Colleges and universities that want to hire and retain the best talent need to understand the importance of building a diverse faculty. Those schools that don’t or can’t because of political interference are simply going to lose out on recruiting the best and brightest young faculty,” adds Muhammad.
As the political attacks on diversity, equity and inclusion in higher gather steam, Muhammad urges policymakers and university administrators to hold the line because science is on their side. “DEI isn’t about pushing some political agenda,” Muhammad states. “It’s about helping our institutions achieve their own stated goals of access and inclusion, and to help prepare the next generation of global citizens and leaders.”
Feature
Five insights on race, class, and gender in the 2024 presidential election from Professors Khalil Gibran Muhammad and Leah Wright Rigueur
Additional Resource
The insights and feedback gathered at the event will guide IARA’s forthcoming report, which aspires to catalyze ongoing policy, advocacy, and community-based efforts for social change.
Feature
Six seasoned speakers offered practical strategies for confronting the anti-DEI movement at the sixth annual conference of the Institutional Antiracism and Accountability (IARA) Project.
Feature
Five insights on race, class, and gender in the 2024 presidential election from Professors Khalil Gibran Muhammad and Leah Wright Rigueur
Additional Resource
The insights and feedback gathered at the event will guide IARA’s forthcoming report, which aspires to catalyze ongoing policy, advocacy, and community-based efforts for social change.
Feature
Six seasoned speakers offered practical strategies for confronting the anti-DEI movement at the sixth annual conference of the Institutional Antiracism and Accountability (IARA) Project.