Danielle Allen
Professor of Public Policy, HKS;
James Bryant Conant University Professor, FAS
Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation
Renovating our democratic institutions for the 21st century.
The Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation addresses the threats to American and global democracies with research and field-building to support power-sharing liberalism. Just societies require robust political equality, fully inclusive institutions, and broader avenues for participation and connectedness, all of which rest on the material and social bases for human flourishing. Our multidisciplinary community of scholars, practitioners, and partner organizations work together to shepherd concepts and reforms into practice—to translate research into impact. From community-led initiatives to national-level policies and structural reforms, the Allen Lab works to renovate American democracy.
Meet the Lab
Ben Barsky
Doctoral Student, Harvard Chan School of Public Health
Sofia Corona
Researcher, Harvard College
Sadie Cox
Executive Assistant to Danielle Allen
Owen Ebose
Researcher, Harvard College
Ami Fields-Meyer
Non-Resident Senior Fellow, Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation
July 2024-June 2025
Darshan Goux
Senior Lab Director, Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation
Brian Highsmith
Doctoral Student, Harvard Government Department
Sarah Hubbard
Senior Fellow, Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation
David Knight
Principal Investigator;
Post-Doctoral Fellow, Columbia University
Hannah Kunzman
Researcher;
Doctoral Student, Harvard Government Department
Woojin Lim
Researcher, Harvard College
Cristopher Moore
Visiting Scholar
Alexander Pascal
Senior Fellow, Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation
Charlotte Ritz-Jack
Researcher, Harvard College
Christian Schmidt
Researcher;
Master in Urban Planning Candidate, Harvard Graduate School of Design
Priyanka Sethy
Lab Program Manager, Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation;
Doctoral student, Harvard Gov Department
Allison Stanger
Non-resident Senior Fellow, Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation;
Co-Director and Co-Investigator, GETTING-Plurality Research Network
Andrei Stupu
Fulbright Doctoral Researcher, August 2024-May 2025
Shlomit Wagman
Visiting Fellow
Jama Willis
Communications, Harvard College
The lab currently supports four research workstreams, all with accompanying impact projects.
Work is carried out through weekly lab and workstream meetings, reading groups, stakeholder convenings, foundational paper development and publication, development of policy guidance, editorial meetings, and dissemination and engagement convenings and activities. Activities are supported with robust project management. The overarching outcome will be a new paradigm for policy-making, and exemplary policies, supportive of democracy in 21st century conditions of digitality, complexity, scale, mobility, heterogeneity, and climate change.
Research Workstreams
GETTING-Plurality: Governance of Emerging Technology and Tech Innovations for Next-Gen Governance through Plurality)
GETTING-Plurality is a multi-disciplinary research network linking philosophers, social scientists, computer scientists, legal scholars, and technologists. The team is building a unique collaborative that unites tech ethics initiatives at Harvard University with external impact partners across higher education and the tech industry, bringing philosophers and ethicists to the table for every project.
We’re at a pivotal moment. In order to promote universal well-being, we need to promote the responsible governance of innovation and responsibly innovate the way we govern.
The GETTING-Plurality teams seeks to advance the understanding of how to shape, guide, govern, and deploy technological development in support of democracy, collective intelligence, and other public goods. The focus is on how to do so, given the plural nature of human and artificial intelligence. The team pursues foundational analysis and theory, field-building, and policy development in key focus areas to foresee and mitigate potential harms to democracy and to strengthen the public benefit and democracy-supportive effects flowing from technology innovation.
PEPL: Political Economy for Power-sharing Liberalism—from Foundations for Flourishing to Abundance
The PEPL Team seeks to develop exemplary policies intended to anchor the paradigm of power-sharing liberalism. On this paradigm, inclusive and dynamic—or “empowering” —economies serve to support healthy democracy. Empowering economies depend on the integration of all members of society into production, and the benefits that flow from it. The economy should work for people, not the other way around. The focus is on supply-side progressivism with investment in foundations of flourishing (from housing to education) and pursuit of abundance in those critical goods through technological and organizational innovation (i.e. solutions to the collective action problems that cause scarcities). Exemplary policies have been developed in the domains of housing, transportation, education, good jobs, justice and safety, health, and climate.
Teams are currently working on innovating exemplary policy in the domains of education and public health and safety. The education team is working on infrastructure to support innovation in credentialing via next-generation badging of competency-based mastery. The public health and safety team is working on pathways to success for racial health equity in alternative emergency response programs.
The PEPL team also seeks to convene the many networks of scholars around the world working to develop a new paradigm in political economy that can respond effectively to the pressing political economy problems of our time—including stalled mobility and dysfunctional immigration policies; the climate crisis; social alienation, disempowerment, and violence.
Collaborating impact organizations include the Justice, Health, and Democracy Impact Initiative; the Democratic Knowledge Project; and Abundance California.
AF: Aspirational Federalism—Strategies for Jurisdictional Innovation in the US Federal System
The work of the AF Team starts from recognition of the value for social resilience and human flourishing of federalist, federated, and even decentralized structures of governance, especially as a response to the scale and complexity of human social organization in the 21st century. The team focuses on the specific case of U.S. federalism and the jurisdictional and organizational innovations that can improve state capacity and secure responsive governance in contemporary conditions. AF Teams are currently working on governance innovations to support accelerated siting of renewable energy projects, fiscal federalism, and a strategy of harmonized federalism in support of increased investment in civic education.
Collaborating impact organizations currently include Educating for American Democracy.
RAD: Reinventing American Democracy for the 21st Century
The RAD Team contributed to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences’ Our Common Purpose Commission and Report and to the development of a holistic, 360° degree standard for understanding the elements of healthy democracy. The Team continues to contribute to the ongoing Our Common Purpose research and strategy work, as well as exploring further challenges to full participation in U.S. democracy. Current projects are focused on civic education in higher education, digital civic infrastructure, America’s 250th anniversary, and immigrant integration and participation.
Collaborating impact organizations currently include the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Partners In Democracy and The Council on Civic Strength.
Upcoming Events
Can Higher Education Help Renovate American Democracy?
Online Event
Virtual Event
12:30 pm – 1:30 pm EDT
The Role of AI in the 2024 Elections
Online Event
Virtual Event
2:00 pm – 3:00 pm EST
The Latest News and Research
Occasional Paper
The National Security Case for Public AI
Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation Fellow Alex Pascal and Vanderbilt Law Professor Ganesh Sitaraman make the case that public options for AI and public utility-style regulation of AI will enhance national security by ensuring innovation and competition, preventing abuses of power and conflicts of interest, and advancing public interest and national security goals.
Commentary
GETTING-Plurality Public Comment on U.S. AI Safety Institute Guidance
The GETTING-Plurality Research Network recently submitted a public comment on the NIST U.S. AI Safety Institute’s “Managing Misuse Risk for Dual-Use Foundation Models” draft guidance. The full text of the public comment can be found below.
Podcast
Conference on the Political Economy of AI Podcast Episodes
Check out the podcast episodes from the Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation’s Conference on the Political Economy of AI to glean insights from each panel.
Occasional Paper
Beyond the Sound and Fury: The Landscape of Curricular Contestation in Texas
In this new Occasional Paper from the Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation, Hannah Kunzman and Danielle Allen offer a case study on contestation over K–12 civics curriculum in Texas.
Feature
AI and Democracy Summer Reading List
This list, curated by the GETTING-Plurality Research Network at the Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation, highlights a mix of foundational texts and new thinking on the timely issue of how AI will impact democracy, especially as we head into election season.
Feature
Conference on the Political Economy of AI
Experts gathered at the Allen Lab conference to examine the incentives and structures of AI development, as well as to discuss the past, present, and potential future of steering AI towards better serving the public interest.
Feature
Can Higher Ed Renew Our Democracy?
In new paper, Danielle Allen explores how higher ed can play a role in promoting the health of our democracy.
Feature
AI and the 2024 Elections
From misinformation to AI panic, experts joined the Allen Lab’s GETTING-Plurality event to discuss the threats the burgeoning technology poses to democracy.
Video
AI and the 2024 Elections
The GETTING-Plurality Research Network at the Ash Center’s Allen Lab and Connection Science at MIT Media Lab hosted a webinar event focused on “AI and the 2024 Elections”. In this session, we hear from Danielle Allen, Harvard University; Sandy Pentland, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and Nate Persily, Stanford University. Each presenter gives a lightning talk, followed by audience Q&A.
Video
GETTING-Plurality Conference on the Political Economy of Artificial Intelligence
The Political Economy of AI Conference was convened by the GETTING-Plurality Research Network, a project of the Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation, housed at the Harvard Kennedy School’s Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation.
Additional Resource
Terra Incognita: The Governance of Artificial Intelligence in Global Perspective
GETTING-Plurality Research Network members Allison Stanger and Woojin Lim, along with other authors, published “Terra Incognita: The Governance of Artificial Intelligence in Global Perspective” in the Annual Review of Political Science.
Video
AI and the Future of Privacy
The GETTING-Plurality Research Network at the Ash Center’s Allen Lab and Connection Science at MIT Media Lab hosted a webinar event focused on “AI and the Future of Privacy”. In this session, we hear from Bruce Schneier, security technologist, and Faculty Affiliate at the Ash Center; Sarah Roth-Gaudette, Executive Director of Fight for the Future; and Tobin South, MIT Ph.D. Candidate and Fulbright Scholar. Each presenter gives a lightning talk, followed by audience Q&A.
Policy Brief
AGI and Democracy
We face a fundamental question: is the very pursuit of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) the kind of aim democracies should allow?
Additional Resource
Democracy as Approximation: A Primer for “AI for Democracy” Innovators
This essay was adopted from a presentation given by Aviv Ovadya at the Second Interdisciplinary Workshop on Reimagining Democracy held on the campus of Harvard Kennedy School in December 2023.
Additional Resource
The Real Dangers of Generative AI
“The Real Dangers of Generative AI” by Danielle Allen and Glen Weyl was featured in the January 2024 Journal of Democracy.
Abstract: As perhaps the most consequential technology of our time, Generative Foundation Models (GFMs) present unprecedented challenges for democratic institutions. By allowing deception and de-contextualized information sharing at a previously unimaginable scale and pace, GFMs could undermine the foundations of democracy. At the same time, the investment scale required to develop the models and the race dynamics around that development threaten to enable concentrations of democratically unaccountable power (both public and private). This essay examines the twin threats of collapse and singularity occasioned by the rise of GFMs.
