A photo from space shows the lights from earth concentrated in urban centers

GETTING-Plurality

A part of the Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation, GETTING-Plurality is a multi-disciplinary research network linking philosophers, social scientists, computer scientists, legal scholars, and technologists

Photo Credit: NASA

Governance of Emerging Technology and Tech Innovations for Next-Gen Governance (GETTING-Plurality) is a multi-disciplinary research network linking philosophers, social scientists, computer scientists, legal scholars, and technologists. We are building a unique collaborative that unites tech ethics initiatives at Harvard University with external impact partners across higher education and the tech industry, bringing philosophers and ethicists to the table for every project.

The network is housed in the Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation.

Our Mission

We’re at a pivotal moment. To promote universal well-being, we need to promote the responsible governance of innovation and responsibly innovate the way we govern.

GETTING-Plurality seeks to advance understanding of how to shape, guide, govern, and deploy technological development in support of democracy, collective intelligence, and other public goods. Our focus is on how to do so, given the plural nature of human intelligence. We pursue foundational analysis and theory, field-building, and policy development to foresee and mitigate potential harms to democracy and to strengthen the public benefit and democracy-supportive effects flowing from technology innovation.

Research Areas

This network will convene multi-disciplinary teams to tackle questions of how to govern emerging technologies and how to deploy emerging technologies for governance from a multiplicity of viewpoints and expertise.

Leadership


Danielle Allen
Headshot of Danielle Allen

Danielle Allen

James Bryant Conant University Professor

Sarah Hubbard

Sarah Hubbard

Associate Director for Technology & Democracy

Allison Stanger

Allison Stanger

Non-resident Senior Fellow, Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation;
Co-Director and Co-Investigator, GETTING-Plurality Research Network

Network Members


Antón Barba-Kay

Distinguished Fellow, Center on Privacy and Technology, Georgetown Law

Tina Eliassi-Rad

Professor, Northeastern University

Ami Fields-Meyer
Headshot of Ami Fields-Meyer

Ami Fields-Meyer

Non-Resident Senior Fellow, Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation
July 2024-June 2025

Zoë Hitzig

Junior Fellow, Harvard Society of Fellows

Saffron Huang

Co-Founder, Collective Intelligence Project

Shrey Jain

Researcher, Microsoft Research

Jonas Kgomo

Founder, Equiano Institute

Yu-Ting Kuo

Faculty Member, MIT and National Tsing Hua University

Seth Lazar

Seth Lazar

Professor of Philosophy, Australian National University

Anna Lewis

Research Scientist, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School

Cris Moore

Professor, Santa Fe Institute

Puja Ohlhaver

Researcher & Lawyer

Omoaholo Omoakhalen

Founder, Remake Africa & Plurality Lead, School of Politics, Policy and Governance

Aviv Ovadya

Affiliate, Berkman Klein Center & Affiliate, Centre for the Governance of AI

Alexander Pascal

Alexander Pascal

Senior Fellow, Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation

Nick Pyati

Strategy, Microsoft

Manon Revel

Postdoctoral Researcher, Meta FAIR & Affiliate, Berkman Klein Center

Mathias Risse

Faculty Director, Carr Center for Human Rights Policy & Professor, Harvard Kennedy School

Divya Siddarth

Co-Founder, Collective Intelligence Project

Ajeet Singh

Physician Instructor and Clinical Informaticist, Rush University Medical Center

Tessel van Oirsouw

Tessel van Oirsouw

EthicAI and Former Visiting Fellow, Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation

Shlomit Wagman

Shlomit Wagman

Faculty Associate, Berkman Klein Center & Senior Fellow, Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation

Glen Weyl

Glen Weyl

Research Lead, Microsoft Research, Plural Technology Collaboratory & Founder, RadicalxChange Foundation

Zachary Wojtowicz

Postdoctoral Fellow in Psychology and Economic Theory, Harvard University

Kinney Zalesne

Former Co-Head of Corporate Strategy, Microsoft

Graduate Student Network Members


Nate Hiatt

PhD Candidate in Political Science, Yale University

Uma Ilavarasan

PhD Candidate in Government, Harvard University

Woojin Lim

Researcher, Harvard College

Charlotte Siegmann

PhD Candidate in Economics, MIT

Luke Thorburn

PhD Candidate, King's College London

Upcoming Events


The latest news, resources, and research


Filter by

  • Format

Filters

Close

Filters

Format

Advancements in Global AI Policy

Video

Advancements in Global AI Policy

The “Advancements in Global AI Policy” webinar featured the following speakers and topics:

            Regulating Web3: Global Trends and Challenges

            Video

            Regulating Web3: Global Trends and Challenges

            “Regulating Web3: Global Trends and Challenges” webinar session featured the following speakers and topics:

            • Peter Kerstens (European Commission) on EU Markets in Crypto Asset Regulation
            • Carol Van Cleef (Luminous Group) on US Approach to Digital Asset Regulation
            • Urszula McCormack (King & Wood Mallesons) on APAC Approach to Digital Asset Regulation
            • Thomas Hardjono (MIT Media Lab) on Technical Standards for Web3

            Summit on AI and Democracy

            Additional Resource

            Summit on AI and Democracy

            On November 7, 2023, the Summit on AI and Democracy gathered experts across multiple institutions to discuss ongoing research, policy, and development efforts related to the recent advancements in artificial intelligence.

            Reimagining Democracy for AI

            Additional Resource

            Reimagining Democracy for AI

            “Reimagining Democracy for AI” by Aviv Ovadya was featured in the October 2023 Journal of Democracy.

            Abstract: AI advances are shattering assumptions that both our democracies and our international order rely on. Reinventing our “democratic infrastructure” is thus critically necessary—and the author argues that it is also possible. Four interconnected and accelerating democratic paradigm shifts illustrate the potential: representative deliberations, AI augmentation, democracy-as-a-service, and platform democracy. Such innovations provide a viable path toward not just reimagining traditional democracies but enabling the transnational and even global democratic processes critical for addressing the broader challenges posed by destabilizing AI advances—including those relating to AI alignment and global agreements. We can and must rapidly invest in such democratic innovation if we are to ensure that our democratic capacity increases with our power.

            The Dark Side of AI: Crime and Adversarial Use Cases

            Video

            The Dark Side of AI: Crime and Adversarial Use Cases

            “The Dark Side of AI: Crime and Adversarial Use Cases” webinar session featured the following speakers and topics:

            • Bruce Schneier (Harvard): Hackers and Security Vulnerabilities
            • Matt Groh (Northwestern): Deepfakes and Misinformation, see related paper The Art and Science of Generative AI
            • Shlomit Wagman (Harvard): Financial Crime
            • Jennifer Calvery (HSBC): Financial Crime

            Introduction to AI and Public Policy

            Video

            Introduction to AI and Public Policy

            The “Introduction to AI and Public Policy” webinar session featured the following speakers and topics:

            • Danielle Allen (Harvard): AI and Democracy
            • Sandy Pentland (MIT): A Practical Framework for Data and AI systems for Regulators
            • Shayne Longpre (MIT): A Primer in Large Language Models
            • Gabriele Mazzini (European Commission): Overview of the EU AI Act

            GETTING-Plurality Comments to White House OSTP on National Priorities for Artificial Intelligence

            Policy Brief

            GETTING-Plurality Comments to White House OSTP on National Priorities for Artificial Intelligence

            The GETTING-Plurality Research Network submitted a series of memos which respond to various questions posed around the topics of bolstering democracy and civic participation; protecting rights, safety, and national security; and promoting economic growth and good jobs.

            Putting Flourishing First: Applying Democratic Values to Technology
            photo of a building that has windows that reflect red and blue shades of color

            Policy Brief

            Putting Flourishing First: Applying Democratic Values to Technology

            In this short web ethics research brief, the authors unpack and comment on the four-step logic at the core of GETTING-Plurality’s foundational white paper, Ethics of Decentralized Social Technologies: Lessons from Web3, the Fediverse, and Beyond. They outline four assertions from the paper that demonstrate the power and the challenge of web ethics – and above all, the urgency – of placing human flourishing at the center of technology governance.

            Plural Publics
            Plral Publics in white text on Teal background

            Policy Brief

            Plural Publics

            The authors highlight why we believe the problem of “plural publics” to be a core challenge of data governance, discuss existing tools that can help achieve it and a research agenda to further develop and integrate these tools.

            How AI could write our laws

            Commentary

            How AI could write our laws

            ChatGPT and other AIs could supercharge the influence of lobbyists—but only if we let them.

            We Don’t Need to Reinvent our Democracy to Save it from AI
            Text from the ChatGPT page of the OpenAI website is shown in this photo, in New York, Feb. 2, 2023.

            Commentary

            We Don’t Need to Reinvent our Democracy to Save it from AI

            When is it time to start worrying about artificial intelligence interfering in our democracy? Maybe when an AI writes a letter to The New York Times opposing the regulation of its own technology.