Ash Center logo

Media Release  

New Harvard Project Research Examines ARPA Distributions to Tribal Nations, Finds Funding to be “Grossly Inequitable”

Programs

Project on Indigenous Governance and Development

Issues

Indigenous Governance

Cambridge, MA – In a new policy analysis published today by the Harvard Project on American Indian Economic Development (Harvard Project), researchers found that funding provided to tribal governments as part of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 was “grossly inequitable and contrary to the policy objectives of Congress, the Biden Administration, and the Treasury Department itself.”

Researchers examined the Treasury Department’s allocation formula, which distributed 65% of ARPA funds for tribal governments based on the number of total tribal citizens served by those governments. The remaining 35% of ARPA funds were distributed based on tribes’ total number of employees, Native and non‐Native, immediately before the COVID‐19 pandemic struck. The authors concluded that Treasury’s formula distinctly favored tribes with relatively high proportions of employees relative to enrolled citizens, which tend to be tribes with strong pre‐pandemic economies.

“Treasury’s formula has resulted in ARPA payments as high as $880,000 per tribal citizen for some ‘have’ tribes. Meanwhile, hundreds of ‘have not’ and ‘have less’ tribes, encompassing 89% of all tribal citizens in the U.S., have received ARPA allocations of less than $10,000 per tribal citizen,” the Harvard Project researchers write.

The report includes a number of suggested remedies for policymakers to consider, including:

  • Create equity offsets by
    1. targeting use of ARPA’s $500 million Local Assistance and Tribal Consistency Fund to address the worst inequities
    2. prioritizing disadvantaged tribes in reconciliation, infrastructure, disaster, and other forthcoming funding measures and in other Departments’ funding for tribes
    3. waiving bureaucratic restrictions on how tribes can use relief and recovery funds
  • Create a permanent and appropriately staffed and resourced Office of Tribal Affairs within Treasury in order to build the Department’s capacity and expertise; and
  • Engage in substantive consultations with tribes that go beyond mere listening and instead generate useable knowledge and policy options.

About the Harvard Project on American Indian Economic Development

The Harvard Project on American Indian Economic Development is based in the Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation at Harvard Kennedy School. The Harvard Project aims to understand and foster the conditions under which sustained social and economic development is achieved among Indigenous nations in the U.S. and beyond.

About the Ash Center

The Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation at Harvard Kennedy School advances excellence in governance and strengthens democratic institutions worldwide. Through its research, education, international programs, and government innovations awards, the Center fosters creative and effective government problem solving and serves as a catalyst for addressing many of the most pressing needs of the world’s citizens.

Contact Information

Daniel Harsha
Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation
Daniel_Harsha@hks.harvard.edu

Sarah Grucza
Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation
Sarah_Grucza@hks.harvard.edu

More from this Program

Tribal Sovereignty in Focus Back-to-School Reading List
A collage of book covers

Feature

Tribal Sovereignty in Focus Back-to-School Reading List

Back-to-school recommended reads from the Harvard Project on Indigenous Governance and Development include books, articles, and podcasts that highlight Indigenous governance narratives.

 

More on this Issue

Tribal Sovereignty in Focus Back-to-School Reading List
A collage of book covers

Feature

Tribal Sovereignty in Focus Back-to-School Reading List

Back-to-school recommended reads from the Harvard Project on Indigenous Governance and Development include books, articles, and podcasts that highlight Indigenous governance narratives.