Feature
Navigating Democracy’s Next Chapter at the “Founding Futures” Conference
Ash Center Fellow Jon Alexander joined a diverse group of speakers at TED Democracy Philadelphia to share bold ideas for revitalizing modern democracy.
Commentary
Ten ways to take down the political temperature
The intensification of political polarization in recent years has raised pressing concerns about the health of democratic discourse and the rise of political violence. Ash Center Senior Fellow Stephen Richer shares ten principles he believes provide a framework for fostering more constructive engagement: encouraging self-reflection, prioritizing substantive dialogue over hyperbole, and creating incentives that reward integrity and ideas rather than division.
Ten ways to take down the political temperature:
1) Self-assessment.
Ask yourself if you’re part of the problem. Be honest. Are you trying to raise people’s emotions for the purpose of getting more attention, more donations, more clicks, even if it generates more anger and hate? Are you fairly and honestly presenting the viewpoints of your opposition?
2) Totality of the person.
Is politics the lens through which you assess a person’s worth? I’ll politely suggest that “Republican or Democrat?” or “Trump supporter or Trump hater?” are incomplete measurements of a person’s value and character and shouldn’t be the primary measurement.
3) Social media disclosure.
It’s well known that some social media companies use algorithms that promote hate and incendiary language. We should push for the disclosure of social media algorithms, and then you should assess if you want to use a social media platform that promotes hate.
4) Focus on good.
Center your political conversations on why your ideas are good, or why your legislation works, or why your political party will bring prosperity to America. Spend less time on why competing ideas, people, and parties are bad.
5) Change political incentives.
Relatedly, try to reward politicians who stand on the strength of their character and ideas rather than those who focus on the alleged bad of competing politicians. Reward politicians who begin their speeches with “here’s how I will be great,” instead of “here are the people responsible for all of society’s ills.”
6) Social media diet.
We know that political commentary on social media is much more extreme and polarized than political discussion in person. Limit your online time. And limit whom you follow online. On Twitter, avoid the “For You” tab and create lists of measured, responsible political accounts to follow. Make in-person events your primary political outlet. Yes, I appreciate the irony of posting this online.
7) Morality or policy difference?
If you disagree with somebody over a political topic ask yourself if what you disagree about is a matter of morality or a matter of policy. If it’s a matter of policy, recognize that, and accept that policy differences are normal and OK.
8) Existential elections.
Resist systems and debates that present the election or the legislative battle in apocalyptic terms, e.g., “if Sam doesn’t win this city council seat, then our city will immediately be in squalor and ruin.” Promote system reforms that lessen the importance of each individual election. We shouldn’t be in a world in which because one candidate got 2% more of the vote, the voices of 49% of the population are squashed.
9) Avoid hyperbole.
Only call somebody a criminal if he’s been charged and convicted with a crime. Only call somebody a terrorist if he uses fear or violence as a means of political persuasion. Don’t ever say we should “lynch” somebody (as was prominently said about me).
10) Ask about motives.
Motives matter a lot. If you disagree with somebody, ask yourself about that person’s motives. If that person’s motives are worthwhile (e.g. he wants to make America a better place), but you just disagree about how to get there, then you’ll have a lot more patience for that person.
Stephen Richer, Senior Practice Fellow in American Democracy, is the former elected Maricopa County Recorder, responsible for voter registration, early voting administration, and public recordings in Maricopa County, Arizona, the fourth largest county in the United States.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and do not necessarily represent the positions of the Ash Center or its affiliates.
Related Resources
Feature
Reimagining Democracy 2026 Summer Reading List
Tova Wang, director of research projects in democratic practice at the Ash Center, shares her top picks for summer reads focused on making democracy more resilient, responsive, and inclusive.
Podcast
Terms of Engagement – The Battle for the Democratic Party
What does the rise of Democratic Socialists and other progessives mean for the future of American politics? Henry Olsen, a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center and a conservative commentator, joins Terms of Engagement hosts Archon Fung and Stephen Richer to discuss.
Feature
Reimagining Democracy 2026 Summer Reading List
Tova Wang, director of research projects in democratic practice at the Ash Center, shares her top picks for summer reads focused on making democracy more resilient, responsive, and inclusive.
Commentary
Allen Lab Fellow Spotlight: City Charters Are Deliberative Democracy’s Friends
Allen Lab Fellow Tyler Fisher examines the untapped potential of city charters as a vehicle for deliberative democracy, arguing that advocates should work to embed tools like citizen assemblies, participatory budgeting, and town meetings directly into the governing architecture of cities, institutionalizing deliberative democracy one municipality at a time.
Commentary
Work in the Age of AI: Reflections from After Neoliberalism
Allen Lab member Charlie Covit reflects on the After Neoliberalism conference and examines the intersection of artificial intelligence and the future of work, arguing that AI forces a democratic reckoning with the meaning of labor itself and that an economy which generates abundance while stripping citizens of purpose and dignity undermines the very foundation of democratic life.