A photo from space shows the lights from earth concentrated in urban centers

Allen Lab: Technology & Democracy

The Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation’s Technology and Democracy workstream aims to ensure that emerging technologies are developed and governed in support of the public benefit.

Photo Credit: NASA

The Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation’s Technology and Democracy workstream is focused on developing democracy-supportive technology policies, harnessing the opportunities for emerging technologies to improve governance, fostering professional norms that lead to technology development supportive of human pluralism, and building a robust pipeline of experts who can bridge ethical and technical considerations within policy and industry spaces. We pursue this work through foundational analysis and theory, field-building, and policy development.

Research Highlights

The Landscape of Digital Civic Infrastructure in Massachusetts

Paper

The Landscape of Digital Civic Infrastructure in Massachusetts

Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation authors offer the first comprehensive analysis of how Massachusetts municipalities are using technology to support civic engagement, government decision-making, and public service delivery.

Crocodile tears: Can the ethical-moral intelligence of AI models be trusted?

Open Access Resource

Crocodile tears: Can the ethical-moral intelligence of AI models be trusted?

Allen Lab authors Sarah Hubbard, David Kidd, and Andrei Stupu introduce an ethical-moral intelligence framework for evaluating AI models across dimensions of moral expertise, sensitivity, coherence, and transparency in their recently published paper, Crocodile Tears: Can the Ethical-Moral Intelligence of AI Models Be Trusted? in Springer AI & Ethics.

Political Economy of AI Essay Collection

Political Economy of AI Essay Collection

Earlier this year, the Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation hosted a convening on the Political Economy of AI. This collection of essays from leading scholars and experts raise critical questions surrounding power, governance, and democracy as they consider how technology can better serve the public interest.

Public AI
A blue background with a chip pattern across featuring hallmark symbols from various public entities

Public AI

This policy primer from the Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation is intended to introduce the ideas and conversations around how public AI alternatives could foster an ecosystem that prioritizes the public interest while offering a counterbalance to corporate concentration.

Section 230 Reform
photo of a computer screen with the numbers 230 on it; a crack on the bottom right of the screen and a hand with a gavel smashes it

Section 230 Reform

This policy primer from the Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation is intended to introduce the ideas and conversations around reform of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and how it could remake the social media ecosystem.

A Roadmap for Governing AI: Technology Governance and Power-Sharing Liberalism

Open Access Resource

A Roadmap for Governing AI: Technology Governance and Power-Sharing Liberalism

This paper aims to provide a roadmap for governing AI. In contrast to the reigning paradigms, we argue that AI governance should be not merely a reactive, punitive, status-quo-defending enterprise, but rather the expression of an expansive, proactive vision for technology—to advance human flourishing.

 

GETTING-Plurality Research Network

At the center of our work is our multidisciplinary research network. The Governance of Emerging Technology and Tech Innovations for Next-Gen Governance (GETTING-Plurality) is a research network linking philosophers, social scientists, computer scientists, legal scholars, and technologists. This unique collaborative unites tech ethics initiatives at Harvard University with external impact partners across higher education and the tech industry, bringing philosophers and ethicists to the table for every project.

Our network seeks to advance understanding of how to shape, guide, govern, and deploy technological development in support of democracy, collective intelligence, and other public goods. Our focus is on how to do so, given the plural nature of human intelligence. We connect theory with practice to ensure that academic insights inform real-world policy and industry standards.

Leadership


Danielle Allen
Headshot of Danielle Allen

Danielle Allen

Professor of Public Policy, James Bryant Conant University Professor

Sarah Hubbard

Sarah Hubbard

Associate Director for Technology & Democracy

Allison Stanger

Allison Stanger

Senior Fellow, Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation;
Co-Director and Co-Investigator, GETTING-Plurality Research Network
Feb. 2024-Jan. 2026

Network Members


Antón Barba-Kay

Distinguished Fellow, Center on Privacy and Technology, Georgetown Law

Emily Clough

Assistant Professor of Political Science and International Affairs, Northeastern University

Tina Eliassi-Rad

Professor, Northeastern University

Jonas Kgomo

Founder, Equiano Institute

Yu-Ting Kuo

Faculty Member, MIT and National Tsing Hua University

Seth Lazar

Seth Lazar

Professor of Philosophy, Australian National University

Anna Lewis

Research Scientist, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School

Cris Moore

Professor, Santa Fe Institute

Puja Ohlhaver

Researcher & Lawyer

Omoaholo Omoakhalen

Founder, Remake Africa & Plurality Lead, School of Politics, Policy and Governance

Aviv Ovadya

Affiliate, Berkman Klein Center & Affiliate, Centre for the Governance of AI

Manon Revel

Postdoctoral Researcher, Meta FAIR & Affiliate, Berkman Klein Center

Mathias Risse

Faculty Director, Carr Center for Human Rights Policy & Professor, Harvard Kennedy School

Bruce Schneier headshot

Bruce Schneier

Non-resident Senior Fellow

Ajeet Singh

Physician Instructor and Clinical Informaticist, Rush University Medical Center

Tessel van Oirsouw

Tessel van Oirsouw

EthicAI and Former Visiting Fellow, Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation

Shlomit Wagman

Allen Lab Policy Fellow AY 2023-2025

Glen Weyl

Research Lead, Microsoft Research, Plural Technology Collaboratory & Founder, RadicalxChange Foundation

Zachary Wojtowicz

Postdoctoral Fellow in Psychology and Economic Theory, Harvard University

Kinney Zalesne

Former Co-Head of Corporate Strategy, Microsoft

Graduate Student Network Members


Nate Hiatt

PhD Candidate in Political Science, Yale University

Charlotte Siegmann

PhD Candidate in Economics, MIT

Luke Thorburn

PhD Candidate, King's College London

Alumni


Zoë Hitzig

Research Scientist, OpenAI

Saffron Huang

Co-Founder, Collective Intelligence Project

Uma Ilavarasan

PhD Candidate in Government, Harvard University

Shrey Jain

Researcher, Microsoft Research

Woojin Lim

Researcher, Harvard College

Nick Pyati

Strategy, Microsoft

Divya Siddarth

Co-Founder, Collective Intelligence Project

The latest news, resources, and research


Filter by

  • Format

Filters

Close

Filters

Format

Conference on the Political Economy of AI Podcast Episodes

Podcast

Conference on the Political Economy of AI Podcast Episodes

Check out the podcast episodes from the Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation’s Conference on the Political Economy of AI to glean insights from each panel.

AI and Democracy Summer Reading List
Graphic that includes all of the book covers mentioned in this list.

Feature

AI and Democracy Summer Reading List

This list, curated by the GETTING-Plurality Research Network at the Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation, highlights a mix of foundational texts and new thinking on the timely issue of how AI will impact democracy, especially as we head into election season.

Conference on the Political Economy of AI

Feature

Conference on the Political Economy of AI

Experts gathered at the Allen Lab conference to examine the incentives and structures of AI development, as well as to discuss the past, present, and potential future of steering AI towards better serving the public interest.

AI and the 2024 Elections
A futuristic sign is covered in circuits and reads

Feature

AI and the 2024 Elections

From misinformation to AI panic, experts joined the Allen Lab’s GETTING-Plurality event to discuss the threats the burgeoning technology poses to democracy.

AI and the 2024 Elections

Video

AI and the 2024 Elections

The GETTING-Plurality Research Network at the Ash Center’s Allen Lab and Connection Science at MIT Media Lab hosted a webinar event focused on “AI and the 2024 Elections”. In this session, we hear from Danielle Allen, Harvard University; Sandy Pentland, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and Nate Persily, Stanford University. Each presenter gives a lightning talk, followed by audience Q&A.

GETTING-Plurality Conference on the Political Economy of Artificial Intelligence

Video

GETTING-Plurality Conference on the Political Economy of Artificial Intelligence

The Political Economy of AI Conference was convened by the GETTING-Plurality Research Network, a project of the Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation, housed at the Harvard Kennedy School’s Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation.

Terra Incognita: The Governance of Artificial Intelligence in Global Perspective

Additional Resource

Terra Incognita: The Governance of Artificial Intelligence in Global Perspective

GETTING-Plurality Research Network members Allison Stanger and Woojin Lim, along with other authors, published “Terra Incognita: The Governance of Artificial Intelligence in Global Perspective” in the Annual Review of Political Science.

 

Hearing on “Where Are We Now: Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996”

Commentary

Hearing on “Where Are We Now: Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996”

Allen Lab Senior Fellow, Allison Stanger, provided testimony for The Subcommittee on Communications and Technology of the Committee on Energy and Commerce hearing on “Where Are We Now: Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996”.

AI and the Future of Privacy

Video

AI and the Future of Privacy

The GETTING-Plurality Research Network at the Ash Center’s Allen Lab and Connection Science at MIT Media Lab hosted a webinar event focused on “AI and the Future of Privacy”. In this session, we hear from Bruce Schneier, security technologist, and Faculty Affiliate at the Ash Center; Sarah Roth-Gaudette, Executive Director of Fight for the Future; and Tobin South, MIT Ph.D. Candidate and Fulbright Scholar. Each presenter gives a lightning talk, followed by audience Q&A.

AGI and Democracy

Policy Brief

AGI and Democracy

We face a fundamental question: is the very pursuit of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) the kind of aim democracies should allow?

Democracy as Approximation: A Primer for “AI for Democracy” Innovators

Additional Resource

Democracy as Approximation: A Primer for “AI for Democracy” Innovators

This essay was adopted from a presentation given by Aviv Ovadya at the Second Interdisciplinary Workshop on Reimagining Democracy held on the campus of Harvard Kennedy School in December 2023.

GETTING-Plurality — “A Roadmap for Governing AI: Technology Governance and Power-Sharing Liberalism”
Pins dot an indiscernible map

Video

GETTING-Plurality — “A Roadmap for Governing AI: Technology Governance and Power-Sharing Liberalism”

This GETTING-Plurality Research workshop session features Danielle Allen, James Bryant Conant University Professor at Harvard University, Director of the Allen Lab, and presenting author of “A Roadmap for Governing AI: Technology Governance and Power-Sharing Liberalism.” Allen was joined in conversation by commentator Rob Reich, McGregor-Girand Professor of Social Ethics of Science and Technology, Stanford University.

The Real Dangers of Generative AI

Additional Resource

The Real Dangers of Generative AI

“The Real Dangers of Generative AI” by Danielle Allen and Glen Weyl was featured in the January 2024 Journal of Democracy.

Abstract: As perhaps the most consequential technology of our time, Generative Foundation Models (GFMs) present unprecedented challenges for democratic institutions. By allowing deception and de-contextualized information sharing at a previously unimaginable scale and pace, GFMs could undermine the foundations of democracy. At the same time, the investment scale required to develop the models and the race dynamics around that development threaten to enable concentrations of democratically unaccountable power (both public and private). This essay examines the twin threats of collapse and singularity occasioned by the rise of GFMs.