Social policies should enable individuals to easily obtain reliable and actionable information to protect themselves from a wide range of risks, vindicate their rights, advance their interests, and fulfill their responsibilities as citizens, workers, and consumers.
Because an informed public remains the cornerstone of democracy, we believe that promoting such access will help make governments and private organizations more accountable and advance the public interest in many other ways.
Mission Statement
The Program on Democracy and the Informed Public conducts research to understand the dynamics through which information is generated, disseminated, obtained, and utilized by the public as citizens, workers and consumers.
We seek to understand “successful” information dynamics that produce reliable information as well as dynamics in which information is hidden, unreliable, deceptive, or used in ways that are individually or socially harmful.
The Program will seek to contribute to the development of policies and practices that improve these dynamics and so empower individuals with reliable information.
The Program will share knowledge arising from the project broadly with students, scholars, policy makers, and the general public.
The Program on Democracy and the Informed Public will aim to:
Understand the dynamics of Americans’ access to information about risks in everyday life, rights guaranteed by law, essential services, and civic responsibilities.
Explore both persistent barriers in information pathways as well as new paths and opportunities to create a better-informed public.
Examine the information needs, preferences, problems, and perspectives of workers, consumers, citizens and others in the community whose welfare is at stake.
Analyze the capacity of individuals and collective groups to act on information in ways that affect private and public institutions in ways consistent with the public interest.
Examine the causes and dynamics of information inequality to understand why some people receive information they can understand as well as inequalities in their capacity to act on or receive responses to their actions.
Seek common learning across a wide variety of policy areas and to develop a common lens of information and the actions cycles that arise from them across many domains of public policy in order to create a platform for both broad research and the dissemination of knowledge arising from the project.
Visiting Professor of Public Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School;
Co-Director of the Program on Democracy and the Informed Public;
Samuel F. and Rose B. Gingold Chair in Human Development and Professor of Economics,
School of Social Sciences and Social Policy, Brandeis University
Director, Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation;
Co-Director of the Program on Democracy and the Informed Public;
Winthrop Laflin McCormack Professor of Citizenship and Self-Government
Ash Center Launches New Program on Democracy and the Informed Public
The Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation at Harvard Kennedy School, has announced the launch of a new Program on Democracy and the Informed Public, a major initiative designed to strengthen democratic governance by improving how people access, understand, and use essential information.
Information Inequality Can Be a Matter of Life or Death
In this paper, Mary W. Graham examines how unintended information inequities undermine critical health and safety alerts. Focusing on three key policies — wildfire alerts, drinking water reports, and auto safety recalls — she identifies common roots of these disparities and highlights efforts by policymakers to address them.
In this study, Archon Fung and Stephen Kosack assess the current state of transparency initiatives across the globe. Honing in on interventions with a focus on “transparency for accountability”—which show mixed results—they develop a framework of five “worlds” that helps account for the variation in outcomes.
Full Disclosure: The Perils and Promise of Transparency
Full Disclosure explores how transparency policies, like corporate disclosures and nutritional labels, can empower citizens and improve governance, but often fall short due to incomplete or irrelevant information, offering insights into making them more effective.