Paper
Additional Resource
As public officials increasingly turn to digital tools, this guide helps Massachusetts municipal leaders navigate Open Meeting Law and their everyday digital practice while safeguarding transparency.
This guide aims to help municipal leaders navigate how Massachusetts Open Meeting Law applies to their everyday digital practice, including the use of social media and hybrid meetings. It complements the Allen Lab’s policy brief on modernizing Open Meeting Law for the Digital Age, supporting compliance with the law as written. This work builds on findings from The Landscape of Digital Civic Infrastructure in Massachusetts.
To read the full guide, scroll up and click “Download the PDF” to the right of your screen.
Disclaimer: The Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office has jurisdiction over Open Meeting Law complaints and provides guidance concerning the Open Meeting Law to local officials. Therefore, any questions concerning the Open Meeting Law are best addressed by the Division of Open Government at the Attorney General’s Office. This document is intended to supplement guidance from the Attorney General’s Office and, through hypotheticals, provide a broad, general overview of how local officials in Massachusetts may use social media while remaining mindful of the requirements of the Massachusetts Open Meeting Law. Its purpose is educational and informational to better understand common issues and practical considerations that can arise when social media intersects with public deliberations and governmental transparency obligations.
Paper
Kenneth Woodland is a mid-career Master in Public Administration student and researcher at the Harvard Kennedy School. He focuses his legal practice in municipal law and is a former city councilor.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and do not necessarily represent the positions of the Ash Center or its affiliates.
Commentary
Allen Lab Fellow Tyler Fisher examines the untapped potential of city charters as a vehicle for deliberative democracy, arguing that advocates should work to embed tools like citizen assemblies, participatory budgeting, and town meetings directly into the governing architecture of cities, institutionalizing deliberative democracy one municipality at a time.
Policy Brief
As technology reshapes how public officials communicate with their communities, this policy brief offers recommendations for modernizing Massachusetts Open Meeting Law to protect transparency and accountability while enabling the tools that expand access to government.
Paper
Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation authors offer the first comprehensive analysis of how Massachusetts municipalities are using technology to support civic engagement, government decision-making, and public service delivery.
Policy Brief
As technology reshapes how public officials communicate with their communities, this policy brief offers recommendations for modernizing Massachusetts Open Meeting Law to protect transparency and accountability while enabling the tools that expand access to government.
Paper
Allen Lab for Democracy Renovation authors offer the first comprehensive analysis of how Massachusetts municipalities are using technology to support civic engagement, government decision-making, and public service delivery.
Commentary
Allen Lab member Charlie Covit reflects on the After Neoliberalism conference and examines the intersection of artificial intelligence and the future of work, arguing that AI forces a democratic reckoning with the meaning of labor itself and that an economy which generates abundance while stripping citizens of purpose and dignity undermines the very foundation of democratic life.